Difference between revisions of "Execution engine"

From AMTech WikiDocs
Jump to: navigation, search
(CEP (Complex event processing =)
Line 1: Line 1:
== CEP (Complex event processing ===
+
== CEP (Complex event processing) ==
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_event_processing CEP]
+
AMTech execution engine is an implementation of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_event_processing CEP] that encapsulate is complexity
 +
 
 
== Execution feedback and/or errors ==
 
== Execution feedback and/or errors ==
 
When an activity is being executed by the execution engine an observationlifecycle type is sent to the ''activity_lifecycle'' topic. Some events are reported through the property  '''event''', among this events:
 
When an activity is being executed by the execution engine an observationlifecycle type is sent to the ''activity_lifecycle'' topic. Some events are reported through the property  '''event''', among this events:

Revision as of 16:01, 15 May 2016

CEP (Complex event processing)

AMTech execution engine is an implementation of CEP that encapsulate is complexity

Execution feedback and/or errors

When an activity is being executed by the execution engine an observationlifecycle type is sent to the activity_lifecycle topic. Some events are reported through the property event, among this events:

  • Start of a reasoner (BEGIN)
  • End of a reasoner (END)
  • Execution errors (ERROR)

The following example illustrates activity "producer": "thingsInBoardroom" reporting action "resourceuri": "/amtech/activities/thingsInBoardroom/reasoners/createThingInBoardroomFromEddystoneBeacon/actions/ReportThingInBoardroom" started "event": "BEGIN"

    {
        "topic": "/activity_lifecycle/thingsInBoardroom",
        "guesttenants": [
            "_ALL"
        ],
        "event": "BEGIN",
        "@type": "/amtech/linkeddata/types/composite/observation/observationlifecycle",
        "producer": "thingsInBoardroom",
        "resourceuri": "/amtech/activities/thingsInBoardroom/reasoners/createThingInBoardroomFromEddystoneBeacon/actions/ReportThingInBoardroom",
        "detectiontime": "Tue Apr 26 21:41:09 UTC 2016",
        "@id": "/amtech/things/observations/983c488f-c3d4-44ec-85f2-795428d12d83",
        "occurrencetime": "Tue Apr 26 21:41:08 UTC 2016"
    }
This is a strong mechanism you can use to trace the execution of your activities if, at a given moment, you think they are not working as expected.

Security context

When you create a reasoner, a dialog appears where you should select a name and an execution behavior. In the case where the execution behavior is to visit all the things returned by the observer, you should also select the security context under which the reasoner will run. Two different options are available:

Security from observation or service
  • Observation's security context.
    It means that the observer will return only those things readable by the tenant of the observation. Also, all actions that create objects (things, observations, notifications, etc) will initialize the security context of the object being created with the security context of the observation being consumed.
  • Service's security context.
    It means that the observer will return all the things readable by the service. Also, all actions that create objects (things, observations, notifications, etc) will ask you to select between the security context of the observation being consumed and the security context of the thing being visited as the security context of the object being created.
Security for objects being created

Extension module

EPC

Debug